GEOPOLITICAL LIGHTS AND SHADOWS
“All the variety, all the charm, all the beauty of life is made up of light and shadow.”
Russian President Vladimir Putin used a series of
statements to justify the invasion of Ukraine. He claimed he was protecting
Russian-speakers from an alleged "genocide" and that the goal was to
"demilitarize and denazify" Ukraine. These statements mask a clear
ambition for territorial expansion to challenge the post-Cold War order. Putin
invoked a sense of historical resentment and national humiliation over the
"greatest geopolitical tragedy" of the 20th century: the collapse of
the Soviet Union and the subsequent expansion of NATO into the former Soviet
bloc.
Ahead of the 2022 invasion of Ukraine, many Western
nations were similarly hesitant to directly confront Russia, largely due to
economic dependence on Russian energy and a general reluctance to engage in a
major conflict. This perceived lack of resolve, particularly after Russia's
annexation of Crimea in 2014, may have led Putin to believe that a full-scale
invasion would not be met with a strong and united military response. The
European Union has committed the same mistakes as in the pre-World War II
period.
Putin failed; he miscalculated his strategy by
anticipating a quick conflict. Russia's goal was to quickly conquer the
capital, Kiev, and overthrow the government, assuming that a quick victory would
prevent a protracted conflict and a strong international backlash.
Putin is not the only player on the international
stage seeking, with China's help, to blow up the great central empire that is
the European Union. Washington broke the promise made to Moscow in the final
months of the Cold War: if the Soviets had accepted German unification, there
would have been no NATO presence east of the German border.
By this logic, even NATO's first enlargement in 1999,
which brought Poland, the Czech Republic, and Hungary into the Alliance, should
be considered the cause of the subsequent devastation unleashed by Russia
against Ukraine.
Putin wants to recreate the Lenin-Stalin Soviet empire
that imploded in 1991. The European Union's military disarmament was one of the
triggers that led to Russia's invasion of Ukraine, and Putin also took
advantage of the nation-building the US has exported to Arab countries without
much prospect of success.
Putin has used his military power to occupy
territories—first in Georgia in 2008, then in Ukraine in 2014, in Syria in
2015, and finally in Ukraine for the second time in 2022—paving the way for the
ongoing tragedy in Eastern Europe.
The European Union has finally emerged from its
ideological rut and has initiated a military rearmament program to send the
unequivocal message that Russia cannot structure its own sphere of domination
in Eastern Europe at will and that the European Union does not accept Moscow's
role as an imperial power.
Since the fall of the Iron Curtain, the US and EU's
policy of "escalation management" has been shortsighted, while Russia
has pursued a revisionist policy aimed at calling into question the end of the
Cold War.
A "deal on Ukraine" that effectively
confirms Russia's territorial gains and allows it to assert the right to shape
Ukraine's systemic transformation in the future—and perhaps even to fully
absorb the country in the future—would represent 1991 in reverse, allowing
Russia to exploit the new distribution of power and its alliance with China to
its advantage.
Ukraine could become Russia's "Vietnam"
because two factors support this argument: Ukrainian resistance and US and EU
military aid, which effectively levels the playing field and prolongs the
conflict. Russia's economic resources are finite.
Russia's Nietzschean will to power must be
counterbalanced by the decadent, liberal, nihilistic West. This philosophical
perspective holds that Russia's actions are not simply about territorial
acquisition or security concerns, but rather a primordial and irrational desire
for self-assertion.
Russia seeks to forge a new geopolitical path and
refuses to be assimilated by a Western system it considers spiritually
bankrupt. The Kremlin's rhetoric, particularly in questioning Ukraine's
legitimacy as a separate state and promoting the idea of a "Greater
Russia" or "Novorossiya," can be seen as an attempt to establish
a new morality of creative, active, and aggressive will to power.
The conflict is framed as a monumental struggle
between competing "wills": Russia's desire to assert its power and
unique identity versus the West's desire to maintain its global moral and
political order.
QUARTAVEL
©
Comments
Post a Comment